
December
2022 Vol. 10 No.10
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint
(PDF) (342 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Ndemmazea
NJ
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN:
2350-2282) Vol.10(10) pp. 147-162, December, 2022
Copyright © 2022 Author(s) retain the copyright of this
article |
|
Original Research Article
Examiners’ Professional Status and Efficiency
of Marking the Cameroon General Certificate of Education
Examinations |
|
Department of Curriculum Studies And
Teaching, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
Email: ndifor.jean@ubuea.cm
Received: 09 November 2022 I Accepted:
11 December 2022 I Published: 17 December 2022
I Article ID: MRJER22028
Copyright © 2022 Author(s) retain the
copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0. |
|
This research
sought to examine the Effects of examiners’ professional status
on the efficiency of marking the Cameroon General Certificate of
Education examinations. The study was prompted by the wide
differences sometimes observed between the marks/scores awarded
by a Chief examiner and other examiners over the same scripts
marked. The study was carried out in the Republic of Cameroon
using the 2021 GCE Examiners of both the Ordinary and Advanced
Level general subjects. The sample size of the study was made up
of 360 examiners and 36 chief examiners. The descriptive survey
research design was used where questionnaire with both close and
open ended questions were constructed and validated for data
collection. Data were analysed descriptively, thematically and
with the use of SPSS statistical package. The findings revealed
that the professional status of an examiner influences marking
efficiency. Based on the findings, some recommendations were
made: The GCE board could organize regular seminars/workshops
for examiners; The Conveyor Belt marking system of marking
should be used to encourage specialization; Two independent
marking of all scripts if not at least for the borderline cases
(39-49 for O/L and 34-44 for A/L) could also increase marking
efficiency; The selection of examiners should be strictly based
on professional backings; and GCE examiners should be more
committed and responsible especially during the marking
exercise.
Keywords: Examiner, Marking efficiency, Marking,
Professional status
|
|