| |
|

December
2019 Vol.7 No.12
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint (PDF) (285 KB)
Search Pubmed for related articles by:
Amin
HAA
Goda
OG
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN:
2350-2282) Vol. 7(12) pp. 150-159, December, 2019
Copyright © 2019 Merit Research Journals
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3589688 |
Original Research Article
Medical students’ reflection on the implementation of a blended
E-learning modality versus conventional E-learning model at
Faculty of Medicine Helwan University |
|
| |
| |
|
Hebat Allah Ahmed
Amin, Mohamed Alaaeldin Abdulmonem, Donia Tarek Mahdy and Omar
Gamal Goda |
|
|
1Pathology
Department, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
2,3,4First Batch (2016-2022),
Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: hebatallahahmedamin@gmail.com
hebatallah.a.amin@med.helwan.edu.eg
Mobile: +20- 01002430090
Accepted December 26, 2019 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
In Egypt, there is a national concern towards a transition to
integrated modern medical educational system. However, the lack
of students’ motivation and engagement have been frequently
observed and reported. Therefore new strategies should be
adopted to improve the quality of education and inspire students
and encourage them. This includes implementation of E-learning
modality to introduce a variety of teaching materials, to meet
the various teaching and learning styles. We aim to report the
students’ perception to the newly applied online modality and to
compare the level satisfaction of the first three batches. In
this retrospective, cross-sectional study, we compared students’
satisfaction regarding the e-Learning tools introduced
throughout Phase I. First batch students experienced interactive
blended e-Learning, whereas second and third batches received a
less interactive e-learning modality. Students’ satisfaction and
comments were collected by questionnaires. Results of the
feedbacks of the three batches are compared regarding the
students’ satisfaction. The mean scores of the rating the
blended online modules of the first batch are 4.63±0.69,
compared to the second and third batches 1.95± 1.10, and
3.00±1.26 respectively. The entire first batch students agreed
that e-Learning is a convenient tool, in contrast to the second
and third batches that showed lesser levels of satisfaction
owing to the inconsistency of the content. All three batches
recommended implementing it regularly and efficiently in all
other disciplines.
Keywords: Blended learning, E-learning, Integrated
curriculum, Online learning, Self-directed learning
|
|
|
|