 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
/ / ER Home / / About ER / / Submit Manuscripts / / Call For Articles / / Editorial Board / / Archive / / Author's Guide / /
|
Other viewing option
Anzeh
MB |
Original Research Article Authenticity of police evidence in criminal evidence |
||
|
Dr. Akram Al Fayez and Dr. Mohammad Baraa Abu Anzeh |
|||
|
Assistant
professor at the Law College in Al Esraa University |
|||
|
Abstract |
|||
|
The complainant
when appearing before the men of the judicial police shall make
his statements within the framework of the so-called "police
testimony" on which the criminal judge may base himself at the
trial stage as proof of proof. The legal logic settles to make
the statements made by the complainant in the early stages of
committing the crime "conditional benefit" and are usually the
truth and closer to be real as being led by the complainant
before he has prepared his defense to prevent and escape the
proportion of the offense to him. As a result of that, most of
the specific form of this conditional statement which is
permeated by a set of controls and conditions that would give it
a legal basis, which creates a reflection on the principle of
which creates a reflection on the principle of self-conviction
of the criminal judge in his assessment, and allow the defendant
to convict him accordingly, even if modified in future before
the competent court and as a result affect the legal status of
the complainant. The focus of this study is to shed light on the
nature of the statement made by the complainant before the
judicial officer and distinguish them from similar legal
situations. And what is its legal evidence in evidence? And to
discuss the most important conditions that must be met in the
police statement to be based on it and extend the emotional
conviction on what is stated and weight, especially if it was
abandoned at a later stage and its role when the judgment is
under the provisions of Jordanian law.
|
Merit Research Journals© 2019 || Advertisement | Privacy policy.