|

June
2018 Vol.6 No.6
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint (PDF) (376 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Hasan
A
Sheikh
MA
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN:
2350-2282) Vol. 6(6) pp. 092-100, June, 2018
Copyright © 2018 Merit Research Journals |
Original Research Article
Exploring Effect of Challenge – Hindrance Stress Model on
Employee Engagement |
|
|
1PhD
Scholar, Lecturer University of Sialkot, Pakistan
2Lecturer University of Sialkot, Pakistan
3Assistant Professor University of Sialkot, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: ramzan_mehar@hotmail.com
Accepted June 23, 2018 |
|
|
The purpose of
this research study is to explore the effect of challenge
hindrance stress model on employee engagement. This study also
objects to identify the role of psychological capital in
employee engagement and challenge hindrance relationship. The
data was collected from a target sample of 11 individuals
through interview. The survey showed a response rate of 90%
which means responses of 10 interviews were usable for the
purpose of data analysis. Individual have potential gains from
these challenge stressors, they are confident, hopeful, positive
and constant as regard to the stressful incident, that they will
overcome it with success and will accomplish their objectives.
To achieve desired outcome they exercise their extreme efforts
with energy and dedication. Henceforth it is hypothesized that
psychological capital can help employees to take challenge
stressors as potential gains and perform their work with
engagement. Though our study does not recognize any fresh stress
management practices, but our study does explain the possible
benefits of detecting stressors as hindrances or challenges, and
then applying renowned remedies selectively. On one side,
managers could try to eliminate or reduce hindrances, as these
kinds of demands do not appear to have any positive influences.
We pointed that this idea stands in contrast to the inferences
of the inverted-U viewpoint, which advises to the managers that
up to some extent, all forms of stressors at work are fine. On
other side, instead of eliminating or reducing challenge
stressors (since there is positive relations with performance
and motivation), in fact managers might rise levels of challenge
stressors as long as practices to reduce the related strains are
being used by them.
Keywords: Hindrance Stress, Employee’s engagement,
Challenge stress, Psychological capital, Organizational
performance
|
|