Home About Us Writing a Scientific Article Author's Instruction Contact us
 

MERIT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND REVIEW (MRJER) (ISSN: 2350-2282)  

 
 

/  /    ER Home   /   /    About ER    /  /    Submit Manuscripts    /  /      Call For Articles      / /     Editorial Board     / /    Archive     / /    Author's Guide  /  /

 
 


March 2015 Vol. 3 No.3

Other viewing option


Abstract
• Full text
•Reprint (PDF) (228 KB)


Search Pubmed for articles by:
 

Baltork MA
Omran ES

Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed









 

 

Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN: 2350-2282) Vol. 3(3) pp. 145-150, March, 2015

Copyright © 2015 Merit Research Journals


Original Research Article

Application of constructivist curricula in higher education in Iran

 
 
 

Meimanat Abedini Baltork1*, Ahmadreza Nasresfahani2, Mehdi Mohammadi3 and Ebrahim Salehi Omran4

 

1PhD Student in Curriculum Development, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
2Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
4Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: Abedini.gilan@gmail.com

Accepted March 24, 2015

 

Abstract

 

Constructivism is a learning theory describing the process of knowledge construction; Knowledge construction is an active, rather than a passive process. Given the importance of this approach in education, especially higher education, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the degree of constructivist curriculum application at Shiraz University. The results indicated that from the standpoint of higher education students, their classes are 3.11 regarding content and it is above theoretical mean 3 and this difference is significant at 0.01 levels. Therefore, it is above the criterion mean. The factor of evaluation is 2.90 and lower than theoretical mean 3 and significant at 0.01 levels, so it is lower than criterion level; however, the factors of objective and learning strategies didn't show a significant difference with theoretical mean, therefore it is at criterion level.

Keywords: Constructivism, Content, Evaluation, Goal, Higher education, Strategies teaching and learning














 

 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
                         

                             Merit Research Journals© 2015 || Advertisement | Privacy policy.