| |
|

September 2014 Vol.
2 No.9
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint (PDF) (438 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Joe
AI
Iderima
CE
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN:
2350-2282) Vol. 2(9)
pp. 203-230, September, 2014
Copyright © 2014 Merit Research Journals |
Original Research Article
Modes of admission and academic performance in Nigerian
Universities |
|
| |
| |
|
Andy Igho Joe1, Peter James Kpolovie2*,
Kalu Eke Osonwa3 and Chris E. Iderima4 |
|
|
1The
Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic), University of Port Harcourt
2The Acting Director, Academic Planning, Research and
Control Unit, Office of the Vice-Chancellor, University of Port
Harcourt
3Department of Educational Psychology, Guidance and
Counselling, Faculty of Education, university of Port Harcourt
4Information and Communication Technology Centre,
University of Port Harcourt
*Corresponding Author's E-mail:
Kpolovie@gmail.com; Tel: +2348088061666
Accepted September 26, 2014 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
With causal
comparative ex-post facto design, this investigation
comparatively analysed academic performance of graduates
admitted through Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination/Post
Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME/PUTME) and
Preliminary Programmes (Certificate, Basic Studies and School of
Science Laboratory Technology [SSLT]) in University of Port
Harcourt. Nine research questions and hypotheses were
postulated. A stratified random sampling technique was used to
draw a sample of 1,200 from a population of 13,898 regular
programmes graduates of 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 academic
sessions from seven faculties. The Cumulative Grade Point
Averages of the graduates were collected from the Exams and
Records Office. While the first eight null hypotheses were
tested with Independent Samples T-test, the ninth was tested
with Two-way Analysis of Variance at 0.05 alpha. Results showed
that graduates who were admitted through the Preliminary
Programmes performed significantly better than their
counterparts who were admitted through the UTME/PUTME in all the
Faculties except in Agricultural Science and Engineering. A
Comparison of the four modes of admission showed the Certificate
Programme has produced graduates with the best academic
performance, followed respectively by the Basic Studies, SSLT
and UTME/PUTME programmes.
Keywords: Academic performance, Causal comparative
ex-post facto design, Graduates, Modes of admission, Preliminary
programmes, University of Port Harcourt, UTME/PUTME
|
|
|
|