Home About Us Writing a Scientific Article Author's Instruction Contact us
 

MERIT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND REVIEW (MRJER) (ISSN: 2350-2282)  

 
 

/  /    ER Home   /   /    About ER    /  /    Submit Manuscripts    /  /      Call For Articles      / /     Editorial Board     / /    Archive     / /    Author's Guide  /  /

 
 


March 2014 Vol. 2 No.3

Other viewing option


Abstract
• Full text
•Reprint (PDF) (334 KB)


Search Pubmed for articles by:
 

Kpolovie PJ
Obilor IE

Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed

 

Merit Research Journal of Education and Review (ISSN: 2350-2282) Vol. 2(3) pp. 028-053, March, 2014

Copyright © 2014 Merit Research Journals


Full Length Research Paper

Utilitarian evaluation of the National Open University of Nigeria

 
 
 

Peter James Kpolovie*1 and Isaac Esezi Obilor2

 

1Director of Academic Planning, Research and Control Unit, Office of the Vice-Chancellor, University of Port Harcourt
2Department of Banking and Finance, Rivers State College of Arts and Science, Port Harcourt

*Corresponding Author's E-mail: kpolovie@gmail.com; peter.kpolovie@uniport.edu.ng
Phone No.: +2348088061666

Accepted March 30, 2014

 

Abstract

 

This study employed Utilitarian Evaluation Design and Discrepancy Evaluation Model, which are the most suitable in educational programme evaluation, to evaluate the National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN) from its commencement of admission in 2003 to 2013. The study covered headquarters and all the 49 Study Centres of NOUN throughout the six geopolitical regions in Nigeria. A sample of 902 was drawn from students of NOUN, and staff of NOUN, National Universities Commission and conventional Federal Universities in Nigeria. A highly valid Utilitarian Evaluation Questionnaire with reliability coefficient of 0.86 was developed for data collection. The research questions were answered using measures of central tendency, and the hypotheses were tested with One-Way Analysis of Variance and independent samples t-test at 0.05 alpha. Results indicated that though NOUN has been partially implemented as defined with aspects of the objectives achieved; great disparity exists between the expected and actual outcomes; and that NOUN is significantly inadequate in addressing the ‘higher education for all in need’ intervention for which it was established. It was recommended among others that funding of NOUN be increased, more Study Centres established, and a National Open and Distance Education Commission be established to supervise, monitor and regulate the NOUN.

Keywords: Utilitarian evaluation design, Summative evaluation model, National Open University of Nigeria, Higher education, Open and Distance learning, Life-long learning.
 

 
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
                         

                             Merit Research Journals© 2016 || Advertisement | Privacy policy.