|
1Department
of Urology, General City Hospital “8th September”, Skopje, North
Macedonia
2Faculty of Medical Sciences, University “Goce Delcev”-
Stip, North Macedonia
3Department of Surgery, General City Hospital “8th
September”, Skopje, North Macedonia
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: jovanivchev@yahoo.com
Received: 26 April 2020 I Accepted: 12 May 2020
I Published: 23 May 2020
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the
copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0. |
|
|
Retroperitoneal
tumors today are still a diagnostic and therapeutic surgical
challenge due to their rarity, late symptomatic manifestation,
complex anatomical topographic localization and the contact with
the vital structures. Of these, according to some studies, about
40% have benign and about 60% malignant characteristics, and
according to other authors malignant tumors are four times more
common than benign. Benign tumors can be of different origin and
malignant can be primary or secondary metastatic lesions. The
primary retroperitoneal neoplasm’s account for 0.1-0.2% of all
malignancies in the human body. 80% of them have mesodermal
origin: liposarcoma (30%), leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrotic
histiocytoma and 20% have neural origin. Liposarcomas are rare
cancer of the connective tissues that resemble fat cells under
microscope. Retroperitoneal sarcomas account for about 18% of
all soft tissue sarcomas. Local recurrences at high stages of
retroperitoneal sarcomas are the most common cause of death in
post-operative patients. The aim of the study was to (1)
Determining of the percentage of the primary retroperitoneal
tumors in relation with the tumors of the other organs in the
retroperitoneum (kidneys, adrenal glands and ureters) in
patients’ undergone surgical treatment at the Urology Department
at the General City Hospital "8th September"-Skopje, for the
last five years. Determining of the ratio between the benign and
malignant retroperitoneal tumors in our study group. Analysis of
the diagnosis, operative and post-operative treatment and
follow-up of the patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.
Comparative analysis of the results obtained with the existing
data in the world literature and relevant scientific papers. The
study covers 220 patients with retroperitoneal tumors treated at
the Urology Department at the General City Hospital "8th
September"-Skopje, in the period between 01.03.2015 to
01.03.2020. All cases of sarcoma retroperitoneal tumors and
metastatic tumors were treated with meticulous open radical
surgical removal of the tumor whereas the benign tumors (lipoma,
echinococcus and retroperitoneal cystic teratoma) were treated
with laparoscopic procedure. Patients with malignant tumors were
treated postoperatively at the Oncology Clinic at the Medical
Faculty in Skopje. CT, MR, ultrasound, PET scan and frequent
check of the tumor markers were used for the patients follow up
for the past three years. None of the patients with primary
malignant tumors received neo adjuvant therapy. Mean data,
percentage representation and graphical representation of the
comparative analyzes were used for statistical data processing.
Of the 220 patients treated with a tumor in the retroperitoneum,
19 (8,64%) had primary retroperitoneal tumors. Of those, 11
patients or 5% had primary malignant tumor, 4 patients (1,81%)
had metastatic retroperitoneal tumor and 4 patients (1,81%) had
benign tumor. The histopathologic finding revealed: liposarcoma
in 9 patients (4,09%), one patient with teratocarcinoma (1,81%)
and one patient with neurofibrosarcoma (1,81%). The
postoperative two years follow up of the patients with
retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) showed local recurrence and mortal
outcome in 2 out of 11 patients (18%). Of the rest 9 patients
with RPS, 7 patients received chemotherapy and 2 patients did
not receive any chemotherapy due to the continual negative
results of the CT, MRI, PET scan and tumor markers. Overall 3
years survival is 81,8%. Compared with other studies where RPS
are present in one third of the primary retroperitoneal tumors,
our study showed retroperitoneal sarcoma presence in 57,89%. The
etiology of such high percentage is a subject for further
studies. Local recurrence appeared in 2 patients with primary
malignant retroperitoneal tumor and in all 4 patients with
secondary metastatic tumors of the retroperitoneum, regardless
the radical surgical and oncology treatment due to the presence
of the high malignant stage. All of the patients with
retroperitoneal tumors had general symptoms (back pain, weakness
and weight loss) and gained first diagnose by ultrasound
examination. Our study showed a high percentage of primary
retroperitoneal tumors with 8,64% compared to the total number
of operated retroperitoneal tumors. Of those 5% were primary
malignant retroperitoneal tumors (liposarcoma, neurofibrosarcoma
and teratocarcinoma). 60% of the treated primary and secondary
malignant retroperitoneal tumors belonged to liposarcoma which
is much higher percentage of the representation described in the
literature to date. The high percentage of 3 years survival
(81,8%) confirmed our decision for radical surgical treatment as
soon as possible, without prior neoadjuvant oncology therapy.
Postoperative chemotherapy is necessary for longer survival
especially in patients with stage T2G2N0M0 and above. The fact
that the 2 patients with RPS did not receive any oncology
therapy, and are still in good health without any local
recurrence, confirms that precision surgery and diagnosing the
tumor at its early stage are key to successful treatment of the
retroperitoneal malignant tumors. Laparoscopic surgery in our
study proved to be an appropriate method in the treatment of
benign tumors while open surgery is still the method of choice
for radical removal of sarcomas according to our experience.
Keywords: Retroperitoneum, sarcoma, benign tumors,
liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, echinococcus, neurofibrosarcoma.
|
|