|

February
2014 Vol. 2 No. 2
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint
(PDF) (507 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Sattar
RA
Hamawandi
M
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Medicine and Medical
Sciences (ISSN: 2354-3238) Vol. 2(2) pp. 054-060,
February, 2014
Copyright © 2014 Merit Research Journals |
|
Full
Length Research Paper
Role of pulse oximetry
screening for detection of life threatening congenital heart
defects in newborn
|
|
|
1MBChB, DCH., Iraq / Sulaimany Pediatric Teaching
Hospital
2MBChB, DCH, FICMS (Ped.), Higher Diploma (Ped.cardiology),
Iraq / Sulaimany University, College of Medicine, pediatric
Department
3MBChB, CABP, Iraq / Sulaimany University, College of
Medicine, Pediatric Department
*Corresponding Author's
E-mail:
asofaek@hotmail.com
Accepted February 16, 2014
|
|
|
Prospective study
included babies born at maternity hospital in sulaimany and
babies born in private hospitals and referred to pediatric
neonatal care unit in the first day of life for optimizing
screening performance with pulse oximetry for detection of life
threatening CHD. The study period was from 1 October 2012 to 1
march 2013. During that period 2371 live babies born. Out of
these new born babies 2181 were enrolled in the study. The
remaining newborns were excluded because they were premature,
and the majority of them are hypoxic at birth due to immaturity
of respiratory center which might lead to high false positive
rate of POS. (Pulse oximetry screening). The POS for both hands
and one foot were obtained within the first 3-6 hours of life.
When post ductal saturation was below 90% it was considered as
positive screening, while saturation between 90-95% and the
difference between pre and post ductal saturation more than 3%
the baby was provisionally considered to be screening positive,
but a repeat measurement was performed. Babies with three
repeated positive Measurements were arranged to have an
echocardiogram performed in the same day according to the study
protocol. The following information of each infant was recorded:
Gestational age, age at echocardiography done, gender, birth
weight, mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5 minutes, any
association like IDM, IUGR, trisomy and any associated clinical
presentation like murmur, cyanosis, tachypnea ,apnea and
grunting. The main outcome in this study is measure of
sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value
of POS. Among 100 baby with positive POS, CHD was detected in 45
babies (45%) 12 babies were classified as major CHD and 33
babies as minor CHD. In 19 patient of all 45 patient there were
additional clinical finding that might have prompted an
echocardiographic evaluation: heart murmur (8), cyanosis (10),
trisomy 21 (8). Of these 12 patients with major CHD 6 of them
(50%) were asymptomatic at the time of POS. POS was true
negative in 2078, true positive in 45 patients, false negative
in 3 patients, and false positive in 55 and 28/55 of the false
positive rate with POS had other pathology. And false positive
rate with pulse oximetry screening is (55/2081) = 2, 6%.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value
for POS in detection of major CHD were 80%, 97.29%, 17.9% and
99.80%, respectively. Our study showed that pulse oximetry
screening of all well babies in maternity units is practically
feasible with a minimum use of time, and that it significantly
improves detection of life threatening congenital heart disease
at an early stage. A significant number of newborns with
critical congenital heart defects that have not been detected
prenatally can be identified at an asymptomatic stage, before
clinical deterioration occurs. This makes it possible to avoid
cardiogenic shock in these patients before hospital discharge.
Keywords: Pulse oximetry, Echocardiography, Screening,
Congenetal, Heart defect
|
|