|

October 2020 Vol. 8 No.10
Other viewing option
Abstract
Full text
Reprint (PDF) (192 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Mgbeje
B
Ebong
PE
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Medicine and Medical
Sciences (ISSN: 2354-323X) Vol. 8(10) pp.
537-547,
October, 2020
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the copyright
of this article
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4121598 |
|
Original Research Article
Towards Establishing
Chemical Markers for Antidiabetic Plants: A Comparative Analysis
of the Chemical Fingerprints of Three Validated Antidiabetic
Plants, Nauclea latifolia, Azadirachta indica and Moringa
oleifera |
|
|
1Department of Biochemistry, Faculty
of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Calabar.
P.M.B. 1115, Calabar, Nigeria.
2Department of Biochemistry, Veritas University,
Abuja, Nigeria.
*Corresponding Author's Email: bobmgbeje@yahoo.com;bobmgbeje@unical.edu.ng
Received: 21 September 2020 I Accepted:
16 October 2020
I Published: 23 October 2020 I Article ID:
MRJMMS-20-153
Copyright © 2020 Author(s) retain the
copyright of this article.
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution
License 4.0. |
|
|
A drawback to the
mainstreaming of medicinal plants into modern medicine is the
issue of standardization of crude plant extracts. The aim of
this study was to compare chemical fingerprints of the ethanolic
leaf extracts of three known antidiabetic plants namely
Nauclea latifolia, Azadirachta indica and Moringa
oleifera and to establish if they are some common
phytochemicals, with antidiabetic activities, that could be used
as active biomarkers for antidiabetic plants and subsequently
for standardization of the plant preparations. The dried
pulverized leaves were macerated in 80% ethanol and subjected to
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.
Chromatograms of extracts showed 51, 35 and 53 peaks of
identified phytochemical compounds for Nauclea latifolia,
Azadirachta indica and Moringa oleifera respectively.
However, only thirteen (13) phytoconstituents namely
3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol, phytol, hexadecanoic
acid methyl ester, hexadecanoic acid ethyl ester, ethyl
14-methyl hexadecanoate, cyclopropaneoctanoic acid, hexadecanoic
acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester,
9,12-octadecadienoic acid, octade-canoic acid, vitamin E,
campesterol, stigmasterol and gamma sitosterol were common to
all three plants. All except three of these common
phytoconstituents (ethyl 14-methyl hexadecanoate,
cyclopropan-eoctanoic acid and campesterol) have been shown in
the literature to have anti-diabetic activity. It is proposed
that anyone or combination of these ten common phytochemicals be
used as active therapeutic markers for standardization of the
three plants and by extension other anti-diabetic plants if this
same commonalities can be established for the plants. Based on
the narrow percentage range in the three plants, Vitamin E(3.45-
3.79%) and 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol(0.87- 1.99%)
should be better active diabetic marker candidates for
standardization of the three plants.
Keywords: Antidiabetic plants, Chemical markers,
Standardization, Nauclea latifolia, Azadirachta indica
and Moringa oleifera
|
|