| |
|

March
2018 Vol.6 No.2
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint
(PDF) (226 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Seyyid
I
Murat
S
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Microbiology and Biological Sciences
(ISSN: 2408-7076) Vol.
6(2) pp. 006-011, March, 2018
Copyright © 2018 Merit Research Journals |
|
Original Research Article
The Advantages of Microbial Fertilizer on
Watermelon in Çukurova Region in Turkey |
|
| |
| |
|
Seyyid İrmak1*, Pakize Gok2, Mahmut
Yegul2 and Murat Simsek3 |
|
|
1Sirnak
University Agricultural Faculty Department of Soil Science,
Sirnak, Turkey
2Biological Research Institute, Adana, Turkey
3Mediterranean Agricultural Research Institute, Adana,
Turkey
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail: seyyidirmak@hotmail.com
Accepted February 12, 2018 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
This study
investigated the advantages of microbial fertilizer to chemical
fertilizers (N and P) on watermelon in Çukurova Region in
Turkey. The experimental design was randomized block with four
replications. There were five different methods: zero doze
control application, traditional fertilizing application (160
kg/ha (N), 80 kg/ha (P2O5). The other application were done with
three different forms of microbial fertilizer; 3000 cc/ha
Microbial fertilizer + 50 kg/ha sugar beet molasses, 3000 cc/ha
Microbial fertilizer + 50 kg/ha sugar beet molasses + high
fertilizer 1500 cc/ha Microbial fertilizer + 20 kg/ha sugar beet
molasses and 3000 cc/ha Microbial fertilizer + % 25 traditional
fertilizing application. The highest yield was 36388.9 kgha-1 in
3000 cc/ha Microbial fertilizer + 50 kgha-1 sugar beet molasses
application and the least yield was determined as 31388,9 kgha-1
in traditional fertilizer (160 kgha-1 (N) + 80 kg ha-1 P2O5)
application. The yield was 35972,2 kgha-1 in 3000 cc/ha
Microbial fertilizer + 50 kg/ha sugar beet molasses + high
fertilizer 1500 cc/ha Microbial fertilizer + 20 kg/ha sugar beet
molasses. Also yield was 34861,1 kgha-1 in 3000 cc/ha Microbial
fertilizer + % 25 traditional fertilizing application. There was
no significant difference between chemical fertilizer
application and microbial fertilizer application. Also in plants
treated with microbial fertilizers, fusarium diseases were also
less observed than chemical fertilizers parcels. According to
these results, it is advisable to use microbial fertilizer which
does not pollute the environment.
Key words: Watermelon, microbial fertilizer, chemical
fertilizer, yields.
|
|
|
|