| |
|

February 2016 Vol. 4 No.2
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full
text
•Reprint
(PDF) (198 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
El-Ghannam
MK
Gendy
AA
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil
Science (ISSN: 2350-2274) Vol. 4(2)
pp. 023-032, February, 2016
Copyright © 2016 Merit Research Journals |
Original Research Article
Controlled drainage effects on nitrate leaching, salinity
buildup and sugar beet production (Egypt) |
|
| |
| |
|
El-Ghannam M.K.1*,
M. E. Abo Waly2, S. A. Gaheen2, F. F.
Karajeh3 and A. A. Gendy1 |
|
|
1Soils,
Water and Environment Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center. Egypt.
2Dept. Soil Sci., Fac. Agric., Kafr EL-Sheikh Univ,
Egypt
3Food and agriculture organization, Cairo office, FAO
*Corresponding Author's E-mail: elghnam_mkh@yahoo.com
Accepted February 03, 2016 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
Subsurface tile
drainage has been effective in draining croplands. Detailed
controlled studies were undertaken in order to understand the
salt dynamics under rice and associated crops and their impact
on soil and drainage water quality. This includes the influence
of different crop rotations, farm practices, and subsurface
drainage status on salt build-up. An on-farm study was conducted
to determine the influence of controlled drainage on salinity
build up though soil profile, nitrogen losses, drain discharge
and crop productivity. A farm was divided into five 2.5 ha plots
and planted sugar beet. One of the plots had a free tile
drainage system at 1.20 m depth, and others plots were installed
with a controlled drainage system at 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1 m. The
objectives of study were to determine the effect of controlled
drainage on salinity build up and losses of nitrogen. Results
indicated that the soil salinity values for the shallower water
table depth at 40cm were nearly two times the salinity values of
the deepest layers compared to the values in the top layers. It
can be seen that, the controlled drainage resulted in
significantly less drainage than allowing free drainage. The
controlled drains only flowed between 24-48 hours for with first
treatment 40 cm depth of water table, while the discharge from
the free drainage treatment occurred for over 192 hours. Flow
weighted mean NO−3 concentration of tile
drainage water was reduced 44.5% from 37.83 kg fed−1
for the 120 cm free drainage treatment to 20.99 kg fed-1 for the
controlled drainage at 40 cm depth of water table treatment in
2013 season under sugar beet crop. In the second season, the
average annual NO−3 loss was reduced 51.94 % from 33.79 kg fed−1
for the 120cm treatment to 16.15 kg fed−1 for the CD
at 40 cm treatment. The area of influence indicated a controlled
drainage yield advantage of 24.4 and 30 % for 2013 and 2014
season, respectively. The greater yield advantage from this
method compared to the free drainage, this suggests that this
practice could generate more profit than free drainage fields.
Keywords: Controlled drainage, Drain discharge, Nile
Delta, NO−3 concentration crop
productivity, Water table
|
|
|
|