| |
|

May 2015 Vol. 3 No.4
Other viewing option
Abstract
• Full text
•Reprint (PDF) (146 KB)
Search Pubmed for articles by:
Mwambu
B
Maina
L
Other links:
PubMed Citation
Related articles in PubMed
|
|
Merit Research Journal of Art, Social Science
and Humanities (ISSN: 2350-2258) Vol. 3(4) pp.
046-054, May, 2015
Copyright © 2015 Merit Research Journals |
|
Original Research Article
Challenges in gender mainstreaming in the
management of water at the bridge water project in Kakamega
County, Kenya |
|
| |
| |
|
*1Brian Mwambu, 2Prof. Elishiba Kimani
and 3Dr. Lucy Maina |
|
|
1Kenyatta University,
Department of Gender and Development Studies, P.O. Box
10012-00200, Nairobi, Kenya
2Kenyatta University, Department Of Gender and
Development Studies, P.O Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
3Kenyatta University, Department Of Sociology, P.O.
Box 43844-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*Corresponding Author’s E-mail:
brianmwambu@gmail.com
Tel: 254 724 684 491
Accepted April 20, 2015 |
|
|
Abstract |
|
|
Water is an
important natural resource in the lives of all human beings.
Women and men have different roles and experiences affecting
perceptions and use of natural resources including water. It is
thus important that men and women be equally involved in its
management so as to effectively and equitably address their
needs, concerns and the distribution of accrued benefits. This
study sought to establish water uses and identify challenges in
mainstreaming gender in the management of the Bridge Water
Supply Project. The mandate of the project was to drill
boreholes for domestic and institutional use, through funding
from donors and the local community. The study focused on the
Bridge Water Project which had drilled 123 boreholes for use in
households, learning and religious institutions in Kakamega
County. The study was a case study guided by the Gender Planning
Framework developed by Caroline Moser in 1980. 10% samples of 13
out of the 123 committees that manage the boreholes were
randomly selected as respondents to the study. They include 5
household committees, 6 learning and 2 committees from religious
institutions. Key informants were heads of selected institutions
and the chief of the location where the study was undertaken.
The instruments used to collect data were Questionnaires,
Focused Group Discussion, Interview Schedule and Observation.
Data collected was cross-tabulated for qualitative analysis. The
study established that women were discriminated against in terms
of access to water management committee positions in relation to
utilization of water as a resource. Water supplied by the Bridge
Project is predominantly utilized by women in learning
institutions followed by households and lastly by religious
institutions. Lack of awareness on the affirmative action policy
by members of the project disadvantaged women to ascend into
leadership roles. Other determinants were associating women to
the gender assigned roles, low level of awareness on gender
mainstreaming by the project members, low turnout and
inconsistency of participation by women during the project
Keywords: Challenges, Committees, Gender Mainstreaming,
Kakamega, Kenya Management, Water
|
|
|
|