|  | Merit Research Journals considers authorship 
				as a means by which we communicate the results of authors’ 
				scholarly input and output, establish priority for their 
				discoveries, and build their reputation among their peers with a 
				view to giving them a veritable ground to be evaluated for 
				employment, promotion, and tenure. In line with MRJ editorial 
				tenets, authorship of a work is claimed by those making 
				intellectual contributions to the completion of the research 
				described in the work.
 
 Determining MRJ 
				Authorship
 
 In line with MRJ editorial policy, authorship is limited to 
				those who have contributed substantially to the work, as such 
				authors are strongly encouraged to indicate their specific 
				contributions as a footnote. In other words, authorship is 
				someone who is involved in the writing of an article, including 
				those who have made considerable contributions to a study such 
				as formulating the problem or hypothesis, structuring the 
				experimental design, organizing and conducting the statistical 
				analysis, interpreting the results, or writing a major portion 
				of the paper.
 
 Authors are those who also share responsibility and 
				accountability for the results as well as bear responsibility 
				for its contents. Thus, unless a footnote or the text of the 
				paper explicitly assigns responsibility for different parts of 
				the paper to different authors, the authors whose names appear 
				on a paper must share responsibility for all of it. We advise 
				that authors be listed in alphabetical order of their last 
				names, irrespective of their contribution to the work.
 
 In order to be considered an author by MRJ, one must have 
				satisfied all three conditions:
 
 >Contributed significantly to the conception and design of the 
				study, the acquisition of data, or the analysis and 
				interpretation
 >Drafting or providing critical revision of the article, and
 >Provided final approval of the version to be published
 
 The acquisition of funding, or general supervision of the 
				research group alone does not constitute authorship.
 
 It is our belief that all co-authors should be able to 
				understand and support the major points of the paper. An 
				author's reputation can be damaged when he allows his name to be 
				used on a paper he does not completely understand or was not 
				intimately involved with.
 
 All authors, including co-authors, are usually expected to have 
				made reasonable attempts to check findings submitted for 
				publication.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |